last fade attempt
This commit is contained in:
+37
-30
@@ -197,56 +197,63 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ── Cross-fades that do not dip ──────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
The default cross-fade is NOT opacity-neutral: both snapshots are opaque
|
||||
and the browser fades one out while fading the other in, so at the
|
||||
midpoint the pair covers only ~75% of the region and the page background
|
||||
shows through both. That dip is the flash - over the whole viewport for a
|
||||
page swap, and over the table, summary and charts (which between them are
|
||||
the whole content column) for a day switch.
|
||||
The default cross-fade is NOT opacity-neutral: coverage of two stacked
|
||||
layers is `new + old * (1 - new)`, so at the midpoint the pair covers only
|
||||
~75% of the region and the page background shows through both. That dip is
|
||||
the flash - over the whole viewport for a page swap, and over the table,
|
||||
summary and charts (between them the whole content column) for a day
|
||||
switch.
|
||||
|
||||
The only opacity-neutral pairing with normal blending is to hold the
|
||||
outgoing snapshot at full opacity and fade the incoming one in on top of
|
||||
it - it is painted above - so every frame stays fully covered. */
|
||||
Two ways out, and which one applies depends on whether the *incoming*
|
||||
snapshot is opaque. Holding the outgoing one at full opacity fixes the
|
||||
coverage arithmetic, but a translucent incoming snapshot then reads
|
||||
straight through it and the old content lingers as a ghost. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* The document background is opaque, so the whole-viewport swap can simply
|
||||
hold the outgoing snapshot until the pseudo elements are torn down. */
|
||||
@keyframes vt-fade-in {
|
||||
from {
|
||||
opacity: 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
::view-transition-old(root),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-table),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-summary),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-charts) {
|
||||
::view-transition-old(root) {
|
||||
animation: none;
|
||||
opacity: 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
::view-transition-new(root) {
|
||||
animation: vt-fade-in 400ms ease;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The day regions are not opaque - they are cards with gaps and headings
|
||||
between them - so they keep a real cross-fade and fix the dip the other
|
||||
way: `plus-lighter` makes the two halves sum to exactly the original
|
||||
wherever they agree, which is most of the region (the card backgrounds are
|
||||
the same on both days; only the readings differ). */
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-table),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(day-table),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-summary),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(day-summary),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(day-charts),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(day-charts) {
|
||||
animation: vt-fade-in 420ms ease;
|
||||
animation-duration: 420ms;
|
||||
animation-timing-function: ease;
|
||||
mix-blend-mode: plus-lighter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The outgoing snapshot no longer fades, so a region that gets *shorter*
|
||||
would keep showing its old tail below the new content for the whole
|
||||
transition. Clipping to the group - which animates between the two sizes -
|
||||
turns that into the shrink it actually is. */
|
||||
::view-transition-group(day-table),
|
||||
::view-transition-group(day-summary),
|
||||
::view-transition-group(day-charts) {
|
||||
overflow: clip;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Chrome that is identical on both sides of the swap: pinned, never faded.
|
||||
(Whole-document theme changes are a `root` transition with no page-switch
|
||||
class, so they still cross-fade the chrome along with everything else.) */
|
||||
/* Chrome captured only so the fading regions cannot paint over it. The strip
|
||||
does change - the selected day moves - but that change belongs to the
|
||||
regions' cross-fade, not to the strip, so it swaps outright: the outgoing
|
||||
snapshot is dropped rather than held, because the selected cell is a
|
||||
translucent `bg-primary/10` tint and anything left underneath shows
|
||||
through it as a second, doubled label. */
|
||||
::view-transition-old(topbar),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(topbar),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(sidebar),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(daystrip) {
|
||||
animation: none;
|
||||
opacity: 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
::view-transition-new(topbar),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(sidebar),
|
||||
::view-transition-old(daystrip),
|
||||
::view-transition-new(daystrip) {
|
||||
animation: none;
|
||||
opacity: 1;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user